Corrigendum: Sequential biomolecular, macrofossil, and microfossil extraction from coprolites for reconstructing past behavior and environments (Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, (2023), 11, (1131294), 10.3389/fevo.2023.1131294)

John C. Blong*, Helen L. Whelton, Eline N. van Asperen, Ian D. Bull, Lisa Marie Shillito*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 3 as published. The taxonomic name for the image in Figure 3A was displayed as “Asteraceae Atriplex sp.”. The correct taxonomic name for Figure 3A is “Amaranthaceae Atriplex sp.”. The corrected legend appears below: Examples of macroscopic and microscopic plant and animal remains recovered from Paisley Caves coprolites: (A) Amaranthaceae Atriplex sp. seeds, (B) bone fragments, (C) Taeniidae Taenia sp. egg, (D) conjoined phytolith sheet, (E) Asteraceae pollen. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1217115
JournalFrontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Blong, Whelton, van Asperen, Bull and Shillito.

Keywords

  • coprolite
  • fecal biomarker
  • macrofossil
  • multiproxy
  • phytolith
  • pollen

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum: Sequential biomolecular, macrofossil, and microfossil extraction from coprolites for reconstructing past behavior and environments (Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, (2023), 11, (1131294), 10.3389/fevo.2023.1131294)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this