Corruption, automation reforms, patron-client networks and new media: Electoral engineering and the may 2010 Philippine elections

Vicente Chua Reyes*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This exploratory inquiry interrogates the impact of electoral engineering reforms through synchronized automated elections in a Philippine context suffering from systemic corruption. The May 2010 elections heralded a watershed in electoral processes and practices. Results of local (congressional) and national (senatorial, vice-president and presidential) elections were obtained nearly overnight. The elections dramatically altered the mode of Philippine elections: typified by arduous and onerous delays in announcing results stretching all the way to several months after elections. Although violence still marred the elections, it was relatively one of the more peaceful elections ever experienced. This inquiry attempts to explore the impact of this unprecedented electoral reform to political competition, allegations of corruption, the prevalence of patron-client networks, the influence of media and the political fortunes of candidates who supported electoral automation. Using data obtained from the elections, this inquiry proposes analytical models in understanding changes and continuities in election reforms and corruption in determining outcomes – individual votes garnered during the elections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-266
Number of pages26
JournalStudia Politica
Volume18
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Facultatea de Ştiinţe Politice, Universitatea din Bucureşti.

Keywords

  • Automation
  • Corruption
  • Elections
  • Patron-client
  • Philippines

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corruption, automation reforms, patron-client networks and new media: Electoral engineering and the may 2010 Philippine elections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this