COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)

Jamie J Kirkham, Douglas G Altman, Jane Blazeby, Michael Clarke, Elizabeth Gargon, PR Williamson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
Core outcome sets can increase the efficiency and value of research and, as a result, there are an increasing number of studies looking to develop core outcome sets (COS). However, the credibility of a COS depends on both the use of sound methodology in its development and clear and transparent reporting of the processes adopted. To date there is no reporting guideline for reporting COS studies. The aim of this programme of research is to develop a reporting guideline for studies developing COS and to highlight some of the important methodological considerations in the process.

Methods/Design
The study will include a reporting guideline item generation stage which will then be used in a Delphi study. The Delphi study is anticipated to include two rounds. The first round will ask stakeholders to score the items listed and to add any new items they think are relevant. In the second round of the process, participants will be shown the distribution of scores for all stakeholder groups separately and asked to re-score. A final consensus meeting will be held with an expert panel and stakeholder representatives to review the guideline item list. Following the consensus meeting, a reporting guideline will be drafted and review and testing will be undertaken until the guideline is finalised. The final outcome will be the COS-STAR (Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting) guideline for studies developing COS and a supporting explanatory document.

Discussion
To assess the credibility and usefulness of a COS, readers of a COS development report need complete, clear and transparent information on its methodology and proposed core set of outcomes. The COS-STAR guideline will potentially benefit all stakeholders in COS development: COS developers, COS users, e.g. trialists and systematic reviewers, journal editors, policy-makers and patient groups.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics
Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2015

Structured keywords

  • Centre for Surgical Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this