TY - JOUR
T1 - Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress
AU - Grassi, Giacomo
AU - Stehfest, Elke
AU - Rogelj, Joeri
AU - van Vuuren, Detlef
AU - Cescatti, Alessandro
AU - House, Jo
AU - Nabuurs, Gert Jan
AU - Rossi, Simone
AU - Alkama, Ramdane
AU - Viñas, Raúl Abad
AU - Calvin, Katherine
AU - Ceccherini, Guido
AU - Federici, Sandro
AU - Fujimori, Shinichiro
AU - Gusti, Mykola
AU - Hasegawa, Tomoko
AU - Havlik, Petr
AU - Humpenöder, Florian
AU - Korosuo, Anu
AU - Perugini, Lucia
AU - Tubiello, Francesco N.
AU - Popp, Alexander
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2021/5/1
Y1 - 2021/5/1
N2 - Mitigation pathways by Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) describe future emissions that keep global warming below specific temperature limits and are compared with countries’ collective greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction pledges. This is needed to assess mitigation progress and inform emission targets under the Paris Agreement. Currently, however, a mismatch of ~5.5 GtCO2 yr−1 exists between the global land-use fluxes estimated with IAMs and from countries’ GHG inventories. Here we present a ‘Rosetta stone’ adjustment to translate IAMs’ land-use mitigation pathways to estimates more comparable with GHG inventories. This does not change the original decarbonization pathways, but reallocates part of the land sink to be consistent with GHG inventories. Adjusted cumulative emissions over the period until net zero for 1.5 or 2 °C limits are reduced by 120–192 GtCO2 relative to the original IAM pathways. These differences should be taken into account to ensure an accurate assessment of progress towards the Paris Agreement.
AB - Mitigation pathways by Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) describe future emissions that keep global warming below specific temperature limits and are compared with countries’ collective greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction pledges. This is needed to assess mitigation progress and inform emission targets under the Paris Agreement. Currently, however, a mismatch of ~5.5 GtCO2 yr−1 exists between the global land-use fluxes estimated with IAMs and from countries’ GHG inventories. Here we present a ‘Rosetta stone’ adjustment to translate IAMs’ land-use mitigation pathways to estimates more comparable with GHG inventories. This does not change the original decarbonization pathways, but reallocates part of the land sink to be consistent with GHG inventories. Adjusted cumulative emissions over the period until net zero for 1.5 or 2 °C limits are reduced by 120–192 GtCO2 relative to the original IAM pathways. These differences should be taken into account to ensure an accurate assessment of progress towards the Paris Agreement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105023305&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41558-021-01033-6
DO - 10.1038/s41558-021-01033-6
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
AN - SCOPUS:85105023305
SN - 1758-678X
VL - 11
SP - 425
EP - 434
JO - Nature Climate Change
JF - Nature Climate Change
IS - 5
ER -