Abstract
This paper draws together the connections between the concepts of critical human security and state capacity and explores their relevance as a novel analytical framework for exploring the global pandemic and its aftermath, with a particular focus on Europe and East Asia. The paper highlights the relevance of integrating a ‘state capacity for human security’ analytical lens and policy philosophy to inform an understanding of human (in)security as well as its relevance for concerns around social protection, sustainability, and inequality. We argue that the long-held and taken-for-granted assumption that larger, high-spending welfare states produce greater well-being security can no longer be an automatic supposition given the nature and sources of risk and insecurity in the contemporary world. We argue that that widening the parameters and focus of social policy analysis towards state capacity for critical human security might better highlight the multi-dimensional challenges that welfare states should seek to address.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 449-466 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Social Policy and Society |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 18 Jul 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 18 Jul 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Research Groups and Themes
- SPS Centre for Urban and Public Policy Research
- SPS Governance and Public Policy Research Centre
Keywords
- East Asia
- COVID governance
- state capacity
- critical human security
- Europe
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Critical Human Security, State Capacity, and Post-Pandemic Policy Challenges in Europe and East Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver