Abstract
This paper contributes to the development of a critical realist approach to discourse analysis by combining aspects of ‘critical discourse analysis’ (CDA) and ‘the morphogenetic/morphostatic approach’ (M/M). Unlike poststructuralist discourse theory, CDA insists on the maintenance of two distinctions: (i) between discourse and other aspects of social reality; (ii) between structure and agency. However, CDA lacks clarity on these distinctions. M/M, on the other hand, offers a coherent modelling of these distinctions that can underpin the application of CDA. The paper begins by introducing CDA, M/M and the existing literature on critical realist discourse analysis. It then establishes the M/M model of social change within CDA’s existing social theory by focusing on ‘analytical dualism’ and ‘social practice’. Finally, the paper locates the concept of discourse within M/M’s model of social change by theorizing discourse as one of four objective structures of meaning.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 433-455 |
| Journal | Journal of Critical Realism |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 13 May 2020 |
Research Groups and Themes
- SPS Centre for Urban and Public Policy Research
- SPS Governance and Public Policy Research Centre
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Critical realism, critical discourse analysis, and the morphogenetic approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver