Abstract
The dynamic displays previously used in visual search have typically not contained low-level
motion signals, but rather involved random relocation of elements. Our subjects searched for a
target Gabor patch, differentiated from surrounding distractors by its carrier orientation (target/
distractor difference varied between 4 and 32 deg), in two display types: static (stationary elements)
or moving (elements smoothly translating in different directions at 3.3 deg sÿ1). A target was
always present, and subjects responded twice on each trial: firstly to indicate that they had found
the target, at which point all elements were masked and the reaction time recorded; secondly to
identify the target location. For easily identifiable targets (large orientation difference), search
functions were similar for static and moving stimuli: both were efficient (shallow gradient with
short intercepts). However, for less easily identifiable targets (small orientation difference), static
and moving search differed: the former became less efficient, but retained short intercepts; for
the latter only intercepts rose. These data present a challenge for existing search models.
| Translated title of the contribution | Crowds or photographs of crowds? Visual search through moving or static objects |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages | 28 - 28 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Crowds or photographs of crowds? Visual search through moving or static objects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver