Abstract
In the UK, United Sex Workers are organising as the sex worker’s branch of United Voices of the World Union and with the broader sex worker rights movement. Sex workers have firmly located dancer unionisation and labour rights within a political framework and set of demands relating to socially reproductive labour and decriminalisation of all forms of sex work. Their efforts have culminated in an Employment Tribunal decision that concludes that dancers fall within the definition of “worker” found in various UK labour laws. Worker status begins to shift the economic risk of dancing onto the shoulders of employers, offers protection against detriment for joining and participating in UVW, and enables UVW to apply to be recognised by clubs for the purposes of collective bargaining. At the same time, the broad perspective and demands of the sex worker rights movement expose the limits of worker status and the gains made through unionisation have, at least at this time, been eclipsed by COVID 19.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 354-375 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Studies in Political Economy |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 20 Jan 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 20 Jan 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We would like to thank the following friends and colleagues for discussing the ideas in this article extensively: Nicholas Beuret, Blair Buchanan, Manuel Cruz, Michael Ford QC, editors of the UK Labour Law Blog, Sonia Nowak, Shiri Shalmy, Sharon Thompson, United Sex Worker Branch (UVW), Richard O?Keeffe, and Xanthe Whittaker. This article would not have been possible without the CERIC (University of Leeds) postdoctoral scheme.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Studies in Political Economy.
Keywords
- COVID-19
- labour law
- sex work
- unionization
- United Sex Workers
Access to Document
- Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)
This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Taylor & Francis at https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.2000208. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.