Data hazards in synthetic biology

Natalie R Zelenka, Nina H Di Cara, Seeralan Sarvaharman, Jasdeep S Ghataora, Fabio Parmeggiani, Jeff Nivala, Zahraa S Abdallah, Lucia Marucci, Thomas E Gorochowski*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Data science is playing an increasingly important role in the design and analysis of engineered biology. This has been fueled by the development of high-throughput methods like massively parallel reporter assays, data-rich microscopy techniques, computational protein structure prediction and design, and the development of whole-cell models able to generate huge volumes of data. Although the ability to apply data-centric analyses in these contexts is appealing and increasingly simple to do, it comes with potential risks. For example, how might biases in the underlying data affect the validity of a result and what might the environmental impact of large-scale data analyses be? Here, we present a community-developed framework for assessing data hazards to help address these concerns and demonstrate its application to two synthetic biology case studies. We show the diversity of considerations that arise in common types of bioengineering projects and provide some guidelines and mitigating steps. Understanding potential issues and dangers when working with data and proactively addressing them will be essential for ensuring the appropriate use of emerging data-intensive AI methods and help increase the trustworthiness of their applications in synthetic biology.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberysae010
JournalSynthetic Biology
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Structured keywords

  • Bristol BioDesign Institute
  • Jean Golding
  • BrisEngBio

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Data hazards in synthetic biology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this