Decolonizing the Cuban Missile Crisis

JE Weldes, M Laffey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)


Postcolonial scholars show how knowledge practices participate in the production and reproduction of international hierarchy. A common effect of such practices is to marginalize Third World and other subaltern points of view. For three decades, analysis of the Cuban missile crisis was dominated by a discursive framing produced in the ExComm, one in which Cuba was invisible. The effort to produce a critical oral history enabled Cuban voices—long excluded from interpretive debates about the events of October 1962—to challenge the myth of the crisis as a superpower affair. Despite the oral history project's postcolonial intervention, however, and greater attention to Cuba's role in the crisis, this framing persists and is reproduced in the micro-practices of scholarship. Decolonizing the crisis, and by extension the discipline itself, is not easy to do.
Translated title of the contributionDecolonizing the Cuban Missile Crisis
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)555 - 577
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Studies Quarterly
Volume52 (3)
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2008

Bibliographical note

Publisher: Wiley Blackwell

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Decolonizing the Cuban Missile Crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this