TY - JOUR
T1 - Dedicated anticoagulation management protocols in fragility femoral fracture care – a source of significant variance and limited effectiveness in improving time to surgery
T2 - The hip and femoral fracture anticoagulation surgical timing evaluation (HASTE) study
AU - On behalf of HASTE collaborators
AU - Farhan-Alanie, M. M.
AU - Dixon, J.
AU - Irvine, S.
AU - Walker, R.
AU - Eardley, W. G.P.
AU - Smith, Matthew
AU - Clements, Christopher
AU - Gilmore, Catherine
AU - Salim, Omar
AU - Mitchell, Stephen
AU - French, Jonathan
AU - Morris, Timothy
AU - Chandrasekaran, Karthik
AU - Osborne, Alex
AU - Ward, Thomas
AU - Kelly, Andrew
AU - Curtis, Alex
AU - Loveday, David
AU - Watts, Anna
AU - White, Jonathan
AU - Patel, Ravi
AU - Mohamed, Ahmed
AU - Francis, Daniel
AU - Phillips, Jon
AU - Jones, Robin
AU - Smith, Ben
AU - Scott, Helen
AU - Thomas, Philip S.W.
AU - Ball, Matthew
AU - Gill, James
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Introduction: Approximately 20 % of femoral fragility fracture patients take anticoagulants, typically warfarin or Direct Oral AntiCoagulant (DOAC). These can impact timing of surgery affecting patient survival. Due to several possible approaches and numerous factors to consider in the preoperative workup of anticoagulated patients, potential for variations in clinical practice exist. Some hospitals employ dedicated anticoagulation management protocols to address this issue, and to improve time to surgery. This study aimed to determine the proportion of hospitals with such protocols, compare protocol guidance between hospitals, and evaluate the effectiveness of protocols in facilitating prompt surgery. Methods: Data was prospectively collected through a collaborative, multicentre approach involving hospitals across the UK. Femoral fragility fracture patients aged ≥60 years and admitted to hospital between 1st May to 31st July 2023 were included. Information from dedicated anticoagulation management protocols were collated on several domains relating to perioperative care including administration of reversal agents and instructions on timing of surgery as well as others. Logistic regression was used to evaluate effects of dedicated protocols on time to surgery. Results: Dedicated protocols for management of patients taking warfarin and DOACs were present at 41 (52.6 %) and 43 (55.1 %) hospitals respectively. For patients taking warfarin, 39/41 (95.1 %) protocols specified the dose of vitamin k and the most common was 5 milligrams intravenously (n=21). INR threshold values for proceeding to surgery varied between protocols; 1.5 (n=28), 1.8 (n=6), and 2 (n=6). For patients taking DOACs, 35/43 (81.4 %) and 8/43 (18.6 %) protocols advised timing of surgery based on renal function and absolute time from last dose respectively. Analysis of 10,197 patients from 78 hospitals showed fewer patients taking DOACs received surgery within 36 h of admission at hospitals with a dedicated protocol compared to those without (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54–0.99, p=0.040), while there were no differences among patients taking warfarin (adjusted OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.75–3.57, p=0.219). Conclusions: Around half of hospitals employed a dedicated anticoagulation management protocol for femoral fragility fracture patients, and substantial variation was observed in guidance between protocols. Dedicated protocols currently being used at hospitals were ineffective at improving the defined targets for time to surgery.
AB - Introduction: Approximately 20 % of femoral fragility fracture patients take anticoagulants, typically warfarin or Direct Oral AntiCoagulant (DOAC). These can impact timing of surgery affecting patient survival. Due to several possible approaches and numerous factors to consider in the preoperative workup of anticoagulated patients, potential for variations in clinical practice exist. Some hospitals employ dedicated anticoagulation management protocols to address this issue, and to improve time to surgery. This study aimed to determine the proportion of hospitals with such protocols, compare protocol guidance between hospitals, and evaluate the effectiveness of protocols in facilitating prompt surgery. Methods: Data was prospectively collected through a collaborative, multicentre approach involving hospitals across the UK. Femoral fragility fracture patients aged ≥60 years and admitted to hospital between 1st May to 31st July 2023 were included. Information from dedicated anticoagulation management protocols were collated on several domains relating to perioperative care including administration of reversal agents and instructions on timing of surgery as well as others. Logistic regression was used to evaluate effects of dedicated protocols on time to surgery. Results: Dedicated protocols for management of patients taking warfarin and DOACs were present at 41 (52.6 %) and 43 (55.1 %) hospitals respectively. For patients taking warfarin, 39/41 (95.1 %) protocols specified the dose of vitamin k and the most common was 5 milligrams intravenously (n=21). INR threshold values for proceeding to surgery varied between protocols; 1.5 (n=28), 1.8 (n=6), and 2 (n=6). For patients taking DOACs, 35/43 (81.4 %) and 8/43 (18.6 %) protocols advised timing of surgery based on renal function and absolute time from last dose respectively. Analysis of 10,197 patients from 78 hospitals showed fewer patients taking DOACs received surgery within 36 h of admission at hospitals with a dedicated protocol compared to those without (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54–0.99, p=0.040), while there were no differences among patients taking warfarin (adjusted OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.75–3.57, p=0.219). Conclusions: Around half of hospitals employed a dedicated anticoagulation management protocol for femoral fragility fracture patients, and substantial variation was observed in guidance between protocols. Dedicated protocols currently being used at hospitals were ineffective at improving the defined targets for time to surgery.
KW - Anaesthesia
KW - Anticoagulant
KW - delay
KW - Femoral
KW - Fracture
KW - Hip
KW - Management
KW - Periprosthetic
KW - Protocols
KW - Surgery
KW - Timing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197587135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111686
DO - 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111686
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 38976927
AN - SCOPUS:85197587135
SN - 0020-1383
VL - 55
JO - Injury
JF - Injury
IS - 8
M1 - 111686
ER -