Democratising policy theories: enhancing prospects for language justice for Sign Language Peoples

SCE Batterbury

doi:10.1332/030557312X655701

Democratising policy theories: enhancing prospects for language justice for Sign Language Peoples

SCE Batterbury

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

379 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The paper argues that policy-makers in the UK do not perceive Sign Language Peoples (SLPs) as a minority language formation. Policies are based on an assumption of disability and deliver unsatisfactory outcomes that struggle to address linguistic exclusion. Multicultural polices incorporating SLPs’ perspectives would offer greater synergy between policy theory and SLP’s lived-experience. More specifically, democratisation of the policy formulation process could lead to achievement of greater social justice for SLPs. Looking forward, the power of transnational networks to provoke national policy change offers a possible way of breaking through existing UK discourse barriers to more democratic SLP-led policy formulation

Translated title of the contribution	Social Justice, Language Policy and British Sign Language: The Deaf Perspective
Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	547-564
Number of pages	18
Journal	Policy and Politics
Volume	42
Issue number	4
Early online date	1 Oct 2014
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655701
Publication status	Published - Oct 2014

Bibliographical note

submitted, waiting editors feedback on minor corrections.

Access to Document

10.1332/030557312X655701

DEMOCRATISING POLICY THEORIES
This is a post-peer-review, pre-copy edited version of an article awaiting editors final approval for Policy and Politics
Submitted manuscript, 143 KB

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Democratising policy theories: enhancing prospects for language justice for Sign Language Peoples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{daacb0a7711142c29345e1af474a8422,

title = "Democratising policy theories: enhancing prospects for language justice for Sign Language Peoples ",

abstract = "The paper argues that policy-makers in the UK do not perceive Sign Language Peoples (SLPs) as a minority language formation. Policies are based on an assumption of disability and deliver unsatisfactory outcomes that struggle to address linguistic exclusion. Multicultural polices incorporating SLPs{\textquoteright} perspectives would offer greater synergy between policy theory and SLP{\textquoteright}s lived-experience. More specifically, democratisation of the policy formulation process could lead to achievement of greater social justice for SLPs. Looking forward, the power of transnational networks to provoke national policy change offers a possible way of breaking through existing UK discourse barriers to more democratic SLP-led policy formulation",

author = "SCE Batterbury",

note = "submitted, waiting editors feedback on minor corrections.",

year = "2014",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1332/030557312X655701",

language = "English",

volume = "42",

pages = "547--564",

journal = "Policy and Politics",

issn = "0305-5736",

publisher = "Policy Press",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Democratising policy theories

T2 - enhancing prospects for language justice for Sign Language Peoples

AU - Batterbury, SCE

N1 - submitted, waiting editors feedback on minor corrections.

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - The paper argues that policy-makers in the UK do not perceive Sign Language Peoples (SLPs) as a minority language formation. Policies are based on an assumption of disability and deliver unsatisfactory outcomes that struggle to address linguistic exclusion. Multicultural polices incorporating SLPs’ perspectives would offer greater synergy between policy theory and SLP’s lived-experience. More specifically, democratisation of the policy formulation process could lead to achievement of greater social justice for SLPs. Looking forward, the power of transnational networks to provoke national policy change offers a possible way of breaking through existing UK discourse barriers to more democratic SLP-led policy formulation

AB - The paper argues that policy-makers in the UK do not perceive Sign Language Peoples (SLPs) as a minority language formation. Policies are based on an assumption of disability and deliver unsatisfactory outcomes that struggle to address linguistic exclusion. Multicultural polices incorporating SLPs’ perspectives would offer greater synergy between policy theory and SLP’s lived-experience. More specifically, democratisation of the policy formulation process could lead to achievement of greater social justice for SLPs. Looking forward, the power of transnational networks to provoke national policy change offers a possible way of breaking through existing UK discourse barriers to more democratic SLP-led policy formulation

U2 - 10.1332/030557312X655701

DO - 10.1332/030557312X655701

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

VL - 42

SP - 547

EP - 564

JO - Policy and Politics

JF - Policy and Politics

SN - 0305-5736

IS - 4

ER -