TY - GEN
T1 - Demystifying facilitation
T2 - 16th International Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation (GDN 2016)
AU - Yearworth, Mike
AU - White, Leroy
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - We believe there are still large gaps in our knowledge of the facilitator role in group decision support processes as exemplified by the use of group model building approaches, and these must be understood and “de-mystified” if use of these methods is to become more widespread. We use the design and analysis of delivering online group model building, based on foundations established by Morton, Ackermann, and Belton (2007), to form a better understanding of the role of the facilitator. Our experimental configuration makes use of Group Explorer (Decision Explorer), a Group Support System (GSS) that is based on the Journey Making methodology (Ackermann & Eden, 2011; Eden & Ackermann, 2004; Montibeller, Shaw, & Westcombe, 2006), but delivered across the Internet in a distributed manner. The facilitator is thus no more or less visible and connected to the workshop as any other participant by way of its online nature. Data from a workshop delivered in this way is analysed and the findings discussed in relation to the following work; i) Callon (1986) on translation and specifically how facilitation addresses the questions of problematisation and interessement (White, 2009), ii) the work of Hiltz et al. (2013) on distributed GSS and the problem of animating methodology, and iii) the “death of the expert” (White & Taket, 1994), which gets to the heart of investigating the role of the facilitator as an expert in methodology. We conclude by reviewing the question of one possible end-point of this work – the demise of the expert facilitator and the rise of a participant-led group decision support process model.
AB - We believe there are still large gaps in our knowledge of the facilitator role in group decision support processes as exemplified by the use of group model building approaches, and these must be understood and “de-mystified” if use of these methods is to become more widespread. We use the design and analysis of delivering online group model building, based on foundations established by Morton, Ackermann, and Belton (2007), to form a better understanding of the role of the facilitator. Our experimental configuration makes use of Group Explorer (Decision Explorer), a Group Support System (GSS) that is based on the Journey Making methodology (Ackermann & Eden, 2011; Eden & Ackermann, 2004; Montibeller, Shaw, & Westcombe, 2006), but delivered across the Internet in a distributed manner. The facilitator is thus no more or less visible and connected to the workshop as any other participant by way of its online nature. Data from a workshop delivered in this way is analysed and the findings discussed in relation to the following work; i) Callon (1986) on translation and specifically how facilitation addresses the questions of problematisation and interessement (White, 2009), ii) the work of Hiltz et al. (2013) on distributed GSS and the problem of animating methodology, and iii) the “death of the expert” (White & Taket, 1994), which gets to the heart of investigating the role of the facilitator as an expert in methodology. We conclude by reviewing the question of one possible end-point of this work – the demise of the expert facilitator and the rise of a participant-led group decision support process model.
KW - group decision support
KW - group model building
KW - Journey Making
KW - facilitation
KW - ethnomethodology
KW - Problem Structuring Methods (PSMs)
KW - Group Support Systems (GSS)
KW - Group Decision and Negotiation (GDN)
M3 - Conference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)
T3 - Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
BT - Group Decision and Negotiation. Theory, empirical evidence, and application
PB - Springer
Y2 - 20 June 2016 through 24 June 2016
ER -