Designing in highly contentious areas: Perspectives on a way forward for mental healthcare transformation

Daniela Sangiorgi*, Michelle Farr, Sarah McAllister, Gillian Mulvale, Martha Sneyd, Josina Elizabeth Vink, Laura Warwick

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference Paper

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

There is growing interest in service design to support transformation in mental healthcare. Early research in this area has shown some promising results, but has also revealed the contentious nature of this work. A better understanding of the complexity of design in mental health is needed to support the development of approaches that are appropriate for this context. As such, the aim of this paper is to examine areas of contention and related strategies employed when designing for mental health transformation. To realize this aim, a qualitative multiple case study of ten service design initiatives in mental health contexts was conducted. The analysis revealed five interconnected contentious issues: organizational constraints; ensuring meaningful participation; culture clashes; power dynamics; and systems approaches. These contentious issues are detailed and related strategies from various cases are put forward, providing a rich foundation for the ongoing development of service design approaches in mental health.
Original languageEnglish
Pages309-330
Number of pages22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2019

Keywords

  • mental health
  • service design
  • participatory design
  • contentious issues
  • strategies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Designing in highly contentious areas: Perspectives on a way forward for mental healthcare transformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this