Skip to content

Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience: a mixed methods study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere016155
Number of pages8
JournalBMJ Open
Issue number11
Early online date26 Nov 2017
DateAccepted/In press - 19 Jul 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 26 Nov 2017
DatePublished (current) - Nov 2017


Objectives: To develop outcome measures to assess practical management of primary surgical wounds and patient experience.

Design: Mixed methods, including qualitative interviews and data extraction from published RCTs.

Setting: Two university-teaching NHS hospitals and three district NHS hospitals in the South West and Midlands regions of England.

Participants: Sixty-four patients and 15 health care professionals from abdominal general surgical specialities and obstetrics (caesarean section).

Methods: Measures were developed according to standard guidelines to identify issues relevant to patients’ experiences of surgical wounds and dressings, including analysis of existing RCT outcomes and interviews. These were written into provisional questionnaire items for a single outcome measure. Cognitive interviews with patients and health care professionals assessed face validity, acceptability and relevance. Findings from interviews were regularly shared with the study team who suggested amendments to modify and reword items to improve understanding before further iterative testing with patients and health care professionals.

Results: Analyses of existing RCT outcomes and interviews produced a total of 69 issues. Pre-testing and iterative revision established the need for two separate measures. One measure addresses health care professionals’ experience of wound management in two key areas: exudate and its impact, and allergic reactions to the dressing. The other measure addresses patients’ experience of wounds in seven key areas: wound comfort, dressing removal, dressings to protect the wound, impact on daily activities, ease of movement, anxiety about the wound and satisfaction with dressing. Each measure took less than five minutes to complete and were understood and acceptable to patients and health care professionals.

Conclusion: This in-depth study has developed two measures to assess practical management of primary surgical wounds and patient experience. Further work to test their validity and reliability and application to other settings is now required.

    Research areas

  • Qualitative research, wounds, dressings, outcome measures, instrument development, patient-reported outcomes, questionnaire development, patient experience

    Structured keywords

  • Centre for Surgical Research

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via BMJ at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 350 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups