Developing, situating and evaluating effective online professional learning and development: a review of some theoretical and policy frameworks

Frances Quinn*, Jennifer Charteris, Rachael Adlington, Nadya Rizk, Peter Fletcher, Vicente Reyes, Mitchell Parkes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As we see a ramping-up of online teacher professional learning and development (PLD) offerings, it is becoming increasingly imperative to consider the complexity and nuances of what constitutes effective online teacher PLD, and to be able to plan and evaluate it. There is a need for PLD to be ‘genuinely effective’, but while descriptions of effective teacher PLD abound, effective online teacher PLD is not as clearly articulated. We analyse characterisations of effective PLD and the extent to which they apply to online contexts. We argue that for online PLD to be genuinely effective—relevant, collaborative and future focused—attention must be paid to practice architectures that hold online PLD in place, to technological demands and to how evidence regarding PLD efficacy is generated and collected. To this end, we propose a heuristic framework for planning and evaluating online PLD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-424
Number of pages20
JournalAustralian Educational Researcher
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Australian Association for Research in Education, Inc.

Keywords

  • Evaluating professional development
  • Online professional development
  • Online professional learning
  • School practice architectures
  • Teacher learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing, situating and evaluating effective online professional learning and development: a review of some theoretical and policy frameworks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this