Developing the WCRF International/University of Bristol methodology for identifying and carrying out systematic reviews of mechanisms of exposure-cancer associations

Sarah Lewis, Mike Gardner, Julian Higgins, Jeff M. P. Holly, Tom Gaunt, Claire Perks, Suzanne Turner, Sabina Rinaldi, Steve Thomas, Sean Harrison, Rosie Lennon, Vanessa Tan, Catherine Borwick, Pauline Emmett, Mona Jeffreys, Kate Northstone, Giota Mitrou, Martin Wiseman, Rachel Thompson, Richard Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
268 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Human, animal, and cell experimental studies; human biomarker studies; and genetic studies complement epidemiologic findings and can offer insights into biological plausibility and pathways between exposure and disease, but methods for synthesizing such studies are lacking. We, therefore, developed a methodology for identifying mechanisms and carrying out systematic reviews of mechanistic studies that underpin exposure–cancer associations.

Methods: A multidisciplinary team with expertise in informatics, statistics, epidemiology, systematic reviews, cancer biology, and nutrition was assembled. Five 1-day workshops were held to brainstorm ideas; in the intervening periods we carried out searches and applied our methods to a case study to test our ideas.

Results: We have developed a two-stage framework, the first stage of which is designed to identify mechanisms underpinning a specific exposure–disease relationship; the second stage is a targeted systematic review of studies on a specific mechanism. As part of the methodology, we also developed an online tool for text mining for mechanism prioritization (TeMMPo) and a new graph for displaying related but heterogeneous data from epidemiologic studies (the Albatross plot).

Conclusions: We have developed novel tools for identifying mechanisms and carrying out systematic reviews of mechanistic studies of exposure–disease relationships. In doing so, we have outlined how we have overcome the challenges that we faced and provided researchers with practical guides for conducting mechanistic systematic reviews.

Impact: The aforementioned methodology and tools will allow potential mechanisms to be identified and the strength of the evidence underlying a particular mechanism to be assessed.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages10
JournalCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention
Early online date4 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Oct 2017

Structured keywords

  • ICEP

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Developing the WCRF International/University of Bristol methodology for identifying and carrying out systematic reviews of mechanisms of exposure-cancer associations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this