Development of a framework to improve the process of recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the SEAR (Screened, Eligible, Approached, Randomised) framework

Caroline Wilson, Leila Rooshenas, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Daisy Elliott, Marcus Jepson, Sean Strong, Alison Birtle, David J. Beard, Alison Halliday, Freddie C. Hamdy, Rebecca Lewis, Chris Metcalfe, Chris Metcalfe, Chris A. Rogers, Robert C. Stein, Jane M. Blazeby, Jenny L. Donovan, Jenny L. Donovan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

4 Citations (Scopus)
266 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background

Research has shown that recruitment to trials is a process that stretches from identifying potentially eligible patients, through eligibility assessment, to obtaining informed consent. The length and complexity of this pathway means that many patients do not have the opportunity to consider participation. This article presents the development of a simple framework to document, understand and improve the process of trial recruitment.

Methods

Eight RCTs integrated a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) into the main trial, feasibility or pilot study. Part of the QRI required mapping the patient recruitment pathway using trial-specific screening and recruitment logs. A content analysis compared the logs to identify aspects of the recruitment pathway and process that were useful in monitoring and improving recruitment. Findings were synthesised to develop an optimised simple framework that can be used in a wide range of RCTs.

Results

The eight trials recorded basic information about patients screened for trial participation and randomisation outcome. Three trials systematically recorded reasons why an individual was not enrolled in the trial, and further details why they were not eligible or approached, or declined randomisation. A framework to facilitate clearer recording of the recruitment process and reasons for non-participation was developed: SEAR – Screening, to identify potentially eligible trial participants; Eligibility, assessed against the trial protocol inclusion/exclusion criteria; Approach, the provision of oral and written information and invitation to participate in the trial, and Randomised or not, with the outcome of randomisation or treatment received.

Conclusions

The SEAR framework encourages the collection of information to identify recruitment obstacles and facilitate improvements to the recruitment process. SEAR can be adapted to monitor recruitment to most RCTs, but is likely to add most value in trials where recruitment problems are anticipated or evident. Further work to test it more widely is recommended.
Original languageEnglish
Article number50
Number of pages10
JournalTrials
Volume19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jan 2018

    Fingerprint

Structured keywords

  • BRTC
  • Centre for Surgical Research

Keywords

  • CONSORT statement
  • Eligibility assessment
  • Non-participation
  • Randomised controlled trials
  • Recruitment
  • Screening
  • Screening logs

Cite this