Skip to content

Development of a tool for coding safety-netting behaviours in primary care: a mixed-methods study using existing UK consultation recordings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Development of a tool for coding safety-netting behaviours in primary care : a mixed-methods study using existing UK consultation recordings. / Edwards, Peter; Ridd, Matthew; Sanderson, Emily; Barnes, Rebecca.

In: British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 69, No. 689, e869-e877, 01.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{1810c42b216746b8bb7b631d3c48e530,
title = "Development of a tool for coding safety-netting behaviours in primary care: a mixed-methods study using existing UK consultation recordings",
abstract = "Background Safety netting is recommended in a variety of clinical settings, yet there are no tools to record clinician safety-netting communication behaviours.Aim To develop and assess the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of a coding tool designed to assess safety-netting communication behaviours in primary care consultations.Design and setting A mixed-methods study using an existing dataset of video-and audio-recorded UK primary care consultations.Method Key components that should be assessed in a coding tool were identified using the published literature and relevant guidelines. An iterative approach was utilised to continuously refine and generate new codes based on the application to real-life consultations. After the codebook had been generated, it was applied to 35 problems in 24 consultations independently by two coders. IRR scores were then calculated.Results The tool allows for the identification and quantification of the key elements of safety-netting advice including: who initiates the advice and at which stage of the consultation; the number of symptoms or conditions the patient is advised to look out for; what action patients should take and how urgently; as well as capturing how patients respond to such advice plus important contextual codes such as the communication of diagnostic uncertainty, the expected time course of an illness, and any follow-up plans. The final tool had substantial levels of IRR with the mean average agreement for the final tool being 88{\%} (κ = 0.66).Conclusion The authors have developed a novel tool that can reliably code the extent of clinician safety-netting communication behaviours.",
keywords = "Primary Health Care, Patient Safety, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Health Communication, Clinical Coding",
author = "Peter Edwards and Matthew Ridd and Emily Sanderson and Rebecca Barnes",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3399/bjgp19X706589",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
journal = "British Journal of General Practice",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",
number = "689",

}

RIS - suitable for import to EndNote

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a tool for coding safety-netting behaviours in primary care

T2 - a mixed-methods study using existing UK consultation recordings

AU - Edwards, Peter

AU - Ridd, Matthew

AU - Sanderson, Emily

AU - Barnes, Rebecca

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Background Safety netting is recommended in a variety of clinical settings, yet there are no tools to record clinician safety-netting communication behaviours.Aim To develop and assess the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of a coding tool designed to assess safety-netting communication behaviours in primary care consultations.Design and setting A mixed-methods study using an existing dataset of video-and audio-recorded UK primary care consultations.Method Key components that should be assessed in a coding tool were identified using the published literature and relevant guidelines. An iterative approach was utilised to continuously refine and generate new codes based on the application to real-life consultations. After the codebook had been generated, it was applied to 35 problems in 24 consultations independently by two coders. IRR scores were then calculated.Results The tool allows for the identification and quantification of the key elements of safety-netting advice including: who initiates the advice and at which stage of the consultation; the number of symptoms or conditions the patient is advised to look out for; what action patients should take and how urgently; as well as capturing how patients respond to such advice plus important contextual codes such as the communication of diagnostic uncertainty, the expected time course of an illness, and any follow-up plans. The final tool had substantial levels of IRR with the mean average agreement for the final tool being 88% (κ = 0.66).Conclusion The authors have developed a novel tool that can reliably code the extent of clinician safety-netting communication behaviours.

AB - Background Safety netting is recommended in a variety of clinical settings, yet there are no tools to record clinician safety-netting communication behaviours.Aim To develop and assess the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of a coding tool designed to assess safety-netting communication behaviours in primary care consultations.Design and setting A mixed-methods study using an existing dataset of video-and audio-recorded UK primary care consultations.Method Key components that should be assessed in a coding tool were identified using the published literature and relevant guidelines. An iterative approach was utilised to continuously refine and generate new codes based on the application to real-life consultations. After the codebook had been generated, it was applied to 35 problems in 24 consultations independently by two coders. IRR scores were then calculated.Results The tool allows for the identification and quantification of the key elements of safety-netting advice including: who initiates the advice and at which stage of the consultation; the number of symptoms or conditions the patient is advised to look out for; what action patients should take and how urgently; as well as capturing how patients respond to such advice plus important contextual codes such as the communication of diagnostic uncertainty, the expected time course of an illness, and any follow-up plans. The final tool had substantial levels of IRR with the mean average agreement for the final tool being 88% (κ = 0.66).Conclusion The authors have developed a novel tool that can reliably code the extent of clinician safety-netting communication behaviours.

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Patient Safety

KW - Video Recording

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Health Communication

KW - Clinical Coding

U2 - 10.3399/bjgp19X706589

DO - 10.3399/bjgp19X706589

M3 - Article

VL - 69

JO - British Journal of General Practice

JF - British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 689

M1 - e869-e877

ER -