Different Routes for Protecting Caste Discrimination: Chandhok v Tirkey

Matias Rodriguez Burr*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

This article analyses the Employment Appeals Tribunal's decision in Chandhok v Tirkey, which confirmed that UK anti-discrimination law can protect victims of caste discrimination under the concept of race (ethnic origins) in 9(1)(c) EA 2010. The article also studies the parliamentary debates that led to the enactment of section 9(5) EA 2010 (that provides for legislation on caste in the future); the state of compliance with this provision; the different routes that have been suggested as a means of protecting caste discrimination absence of specific legislation; and the potential incapacity of the case law in Chandhok v Tirkey to fully cover this form of unequal treatment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)406-416
Number of pages11
JournalIndustrial Law Journal
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Sept 2017

Keywords

  • Caste discrimination Equality Act ethnic origin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Different Routes for Protecting Caste Discrimination: Chandhok v Tirkey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this