Difficulties faced by physicians from four European countries in rebutting anti-vaccination arguments: A cross-sectional study

Dawn Holford*, Philipp Schmid, Angelo Fasce, Amanda Garrison, Linda Karlsson, Frederike Taubert, Pierre Verger , Stephan Lewandowsky, Harriet Fisher, Cornelia Betsch, Fernanda Rodrigues, Anna Soveri

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Introduction:
Physicians play a critical role in encouraging their patients to get vaccinated, in part by responding to patients’ concerns about vaccines. It is therefore important to understand what difficulties physicians have in dealing with different concerns they may encounter. The aim of this article was to determine physicians’ perceptions of difficulties in rebutting different anti-vaccination arguments from patients using data collected as part of a cross-sectional, cross-national questionnaire on physicians’ vaccine attitudes and behaviours.

Methods:
Physicians in four European countries (Finland, Germany, France, and Portugal, total n = 2,718) rated 33 different arguments, chosen to represent 11 different psychological motivations underlying vaccine hesitancy, in terms of their perceptions of how difficult each argument would be to rebut.

Results:
Across all countries, physicians perceived arguments based on religious concerns and “reactance” (i.e., resistance to perceived curbs of freedom) to be the most difficult to rebut, whereas arguments based on patients’ distorted perception of the risks of disease and vaccines were perceived to be the easiest. There were also between-country differences in the level of perceived difficulty of argument rebuttal. Physicians’ perceived difficulty with rebutting arguments was significantly negatively correlated with their vaccine recommendation behaviours and their preparedness for vaccination discussions.

Conclusions:
Physicians may feel better equipped to counter arguments that can be rebutted with facts and evidence, but may struggle to respond when arguments are motivated by psychological dispositions or values.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere000195
Number of pages12
JournalBMJ Public Health
Volume2
Issue number1
Early online date13 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024.

Structured keywords

  • TeDCog
  • Self and Society (Psychological Science)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Difficulties faced by physicians from four European countries in rebutting anti-vaccination arguments: A cross-sectional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this