Dirty work and the construction of identity. An ethnographic study of management accounting practices

Jérémy Morales, Caroline Lambert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

114 Citations (Scopus)


This paper examines the processes by which identity work influences accounting and organisational practices. Analysing ethnographic material, we study how accountants engage in a struggle for recognition in a context where tensions emerge from the confrontation between idealised occupational aspirations and situated possibilities. To theorise this struggle we draw on Everett Hughes’s conceptualisation of a moral division of labour. Building on his concept of “dirty work”, we differentiate between the “unclean” and the “polluted”. Accountants have to perform tasks that are incompatible with the aspirational identities they claim; more than “boring”, these tasks become symbols of misrecognition. We call these unclean tasks. Yet even tasks that, in a more favourable context, would be associated with prestigious aspects of the job, can become degrading in specific situations. We call them polluted work. We highlight how trying to comply with a positively-anticipated role transition can help avoid unclean work yet generate more polluted work. Our analysis suggests that paying greater attention to symbolic differentiations between prestigious and shameful aspects of work can improve our understanding of accounting, identity work and organisational practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-244
Number of pages17
JournalAccounting, Organizations and Society
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Bibliographical note

Cited By :31 Export Date: 13 September 2018


Dive into the research topics of 'Dirty work and the construction of identity. An ethnographic study of management accounting practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this