Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study

Britta Tendal, Julian P T Higgins, Peter Jüni, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Sven Trelle, Eveline Nüesch, Simon Wandel, Anders W Jørgensen, Katarina Gesser, Søren Ilsøe-Kristensen, Peter C Gøtzsche

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To study the inter-observer variation related to extraction of continuous and numerical rating scale data from trial reports for use in meta-analyses.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)b3128
JournalBMJ
Volume339
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • Review Literature as Topic
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Data Collection
  • Observer Variation
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Tendal, B., Higgins, J. P. T., Jüni, P., Hróbjartsson, A., Trelle, S., Nüesch, E., Wandel, S., Jørgensen, A. W., Gesser, K., Ilsøe-Kristensen, S., & Gøtzsche, P. C. (2009). Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study. BMJ, 339, b3128. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3128