Disentangling rock record bias and common-cause from redundancy in the British fossil record

Alexander M. Dunhill*, Bjarte Hannisdal, Michael J. Benton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The fossil record documents the history of life, but the reliability of that record has often been questioned. Spatiotemporal variability in sedimentary rock volume, sampling and research effort especially frustrates global-scale diversity reconstructions. Various proposals have been made to rectify palaeodiversity estimates using proxy measures for the availability and sampling of the rock record, but the validity of these approaches remains controversial. Targeting the rich fossil record of Great Britain as a highly detailed regional exemplar, our statistical analysis shows that marine outcrop area contains a signal useful for predicting changes in diversity, collections and formations, whereas terrestrial outcrop area contains a signal useful for predicting formations. In contrast, collection and formation counts are information redundant with fossil richness, characterized by symmetric, bidirectional information flow. If this is true, the widespread use of collection and formation counts as sampling proxies to correct the raw palaeodiversity data may be unwarranted.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4818
JournalNature Communications
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Sep 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disentangling rock record bias and common-cause from redundancy in the British fossil record'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this