Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Do civil engineering systems need systematising? Tackling complexity – top 10 issues for civil engineering systems

  • David I Blockley

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Civil engineering systems is crucially about promoting and developing ‘systems thinking’ to solve or
    resolve civil engineering problems. The gaps between practice, theory and why things go wrong have
    narrowed but there is still much to be done. Civil engineering systems thinkers have absorbed and applied
    the ideas of others. But we have also developed ideas that are relevant outside of our own domain and
    evidence of our influence is growing. Five examples are modelling, conceptions of uncertainty and risk, the
    critical importance of the legal ‘duty of care’ and the relationship between ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ systems. Ten
    generic questions are discussed and tentative answers given. They include, what is the status of a model
    compared to a theory? What constitutes practical rigour? Are hard and soft systems irreconcilable? What
    is the nature of truth? How do we characterise and model uncertainty? Are risk and vulnerability different?
    Do risks incubate or emerge?
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalCivil Engineering and Environmental Systems
    Publication statusPublished - 18 Dec 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Do civil engineering systems need systematising? Tackling complexity – top 10 issues for civil engineering systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this