Does gender diversity on banks' boards matter? Evidence from public bailouts

Giovanni Cardillo, Enrico Onali*, Giuseppe Torluccio

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

86 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We are the first to examine the impact of gender diversity on banks' boards on the probability and size of public bailouts. Our findings, based on a sample of listed European banks over the period 2005–2017, suggest that banks with more gender-diverse boards are less likely to receive a public bailout and receive a lower amount of bailout funds as a percentage of total assets than banks with less gender-diverse boards. Specifically, an increase by one standard deviation in gender diversity decreases the probability of a bailout by at least 2.44%, a significant reduction considering that the unconditional probability is 18.7%. Gender diversity is also positively related to bank performance, as proxied by ROA and Tobin's Q and with dividend payout ratios, consistent with the hypothesis that female directors are better monitors than male directors. These results are robust to a variety of econometric approaches and provide support for recent reforms in several EU countries regarding gender quotas.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101560
JournalJournal of Corporate Finance
Volume71
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors

Research Groups and Themes

  • AF Banking

Keywords

  • Bailout
  • Banks
  • Corporate governance
  • Gender
  • Performance
  • Risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does gender diversity on banks' boards matter? Evidence from public bailouts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this