Skip to content

Does kin selection theory help to explain support networks among farmers in South-Central Ethiopia?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
JournalHuman Nature: An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective
DateSubmitted - 1 Jun 2018
DateAccepted/In press (current) - 18 Feb 2019


Social support networks play a key role in human livelihood security, especially in vulnerable communities. Here we explore how evolutionary ideas of kin selection and intra-household resource competition can explain individual variation in daily-support network size and composition in a South-Central Ethiopian agricultural community. We consider both domestic and agricultural help across two generations with different large-wealth transfer norms that yield different contexts for sibling competition.
For farmers who inherited land rights from family, first-borns were more likely to report daily support from parents and to have larger non-parental kin networks (n=176). Compared with other farmers, first-borns were also more likely to reciprocate their parents’ support, and to help non-parental kin without reciprocity.
For farmers who received land rights from the government (n=150), middle-born farmers reported more non-parental kin in their support networks compared with other farmers; non-reciprocal interactions were particularly common in both directions. This suggests a diversification of adult support network to non-parental kin, possibly in response to a long-term parental investment disadvantage of being middle-born sons. In all instances (with or without land inheritance), last-born farmers were the most disadvantaged in terms of kin support.
Overall, we found that non-reciprocal interactions among farmers follow predictions of kin selection, and were more common for kin versus non-kin, and for close kin versus distant kin. Direct reciprocity explained a substantial part of the support received from kin, suggesting the importance of the combined effects of kin selection and reciprocity for investment from kin.



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) will be available online via Springer Link at [insert hyperlink]. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 2 MB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 1/01/99

    Request copy

    Licence: Other

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups