Skip to content

Don't birth cohorts matter? A commentary and simulation exercise on Reither, Hauser and Yang's (2009) age-period-cohort study of obesity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-180
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Early online date19 Sep 2013
DateE-pub ahead of print - 19 Sep 2013
DatePublished (current) - Jan 2014


Reither et al. (2009) use a Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort model (HAPC - Yang & Land, 2006) to assess changes in obesity in the USA population. Their results suggest that there is only a minimal effect of cohorts, and that it is periods which have driven the increase in obesity over time. We use simulations to show that this result may be incorrect. Using simulated data in which it is cohorts, rather than periods, that are responsible for the rise in obesity, we are able to replicate the period-trending results of Reither et al. In this instance, the HAPC model misses the true cohort trend entirely, erroneously finds a period trend, and underestimates the age trend. Reither et al.’s results may be correct, but because age, period and cohort are confounded there is no way to tell. This is typical of age-period-cohort models, and shows the importance of caution when any APC model is used. We finish with a discussion of ways forward for researchers wishing to model age, period and cohort in a robust and non-arbitrary manner.

    Research areas

  • Age-period-cohort models, Model identification , Obesity, Collinearity

Download statistics

No data available

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups