Double-blind reviewing at EvoLang 11 reveals gender bias

Sean Roberts, Tessa Verhoef

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The impact of introducing double-blind reviewing in the most recent Evolution of Language conference is assessed. The ranking of papers is compared between EvoLang 11 (double-blind review) and EvoLang 9 and 10 (single-blind review). Main effects were found for first author gender by conference. The results mirror some findings in the literature on the effects of double-blind review, suggesting that it helps reduce a bias against female authors.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberlzw009
Pages (from-to)163-167
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Language Evolution
Volume1
Issue number2
Early online date26 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Double-blind reviewing at EvoLang 11 reveals gender bias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this