Abstract
The impact of introducing double-blind reviewing in the most recent Evolution of Language conference is assessed. The ranking of papers is compared between EvoLang 11 (double-blind review) and EvoLang 9 and 10 (single-blind review). Main effects were found for first author gender by conference. The results mirror some findings in the literature on the effects of double-blind review, suggesting that it helps reduce a bias against female authors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | lzw009 |
| Pages (from-to) | 163-167 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Language Evolution |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 26 Jul 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Double-blind reviewing at EvoLang 11 reveals gender bias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver