Skip to content

Duration of untreated psychosis and clinical outcomes of first episode psychosis: An observational and an instrumental variables analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)841-847
Number of pages7
JournalEarly Intervention in Psychiatry
Volume13
Issue number4
Early online date26 Apr 2018
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 13 Mar 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 26 Apr 2018
DatePublished (current) - 1 Aug 2019

Abstract

Aim: Duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is considered as a key prognostic variable in psychosis. Yet, it is unclear whether a longer DUP causes worse outcomes or whether reported associations have alternative explanations. Methods: Data from 2 cohorts of patients with first episode psychosis were used (n = 2134). Measures of DUP were assessed at baseline and outcomes at 12 months. Regression models were used to investigate the associations between DUP and outcomes. We also investigated whether any associations were replicated using instrumental variables (IV) analysis to reduce the effect of residual confounding and measurement bias. Results: There were associations between DUP per 1-year increase and positive psychotic symptoms (7.0% in symptom score increase 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0%, 10.0%, P <.001), worse recovery (risk difference [RD] 0.78, 95%, CI 0.68, 0.83, P <.001) and worse global functioning (0.62 decrease in functioning score 95% CI −1.19, −0.04, P =.035). There was no evidence of an association with negative psychotic symptoms (1.0%, 95%, CI −2.0%, 5.0%, P =.455). The IV analysis showed weaker evidence of associations in the same direction between DUP per 1-year increase and positive psychotic symptoms, recovery and global functioning. However, there was evidence of an inverse association with negative psychotic symptoms (decrease of 15.0% in symptom score 95% CI −26.0%, −3.0%, P =.016). Conclusions: We have confirmed previous findings of a positive association between positive psychotic symptoms, global functioning and recovery and DUP using regression analysis. IV analysis shows some support for these findings. Future investigation using IV analysis should be repeated in large data sets.

    Research areas

  • confounding factors, epidemiology, psychotic disorders, signs and symptoms, epidemiologic methods

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Wiley at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/eip.12676 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 310 KB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups