Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.

Shelley Potter, Alice Chambers, Sasirekha Govindarajulu, AK Sahu, R Warr, Simon Cawthorn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:
Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) may improve outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction, but recent evidence suggests complication rates may be higher when ADM is used. We retrospectively compared early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction (BR) with and without ADM to evaluate the safety of the procedure in our centre.
METHODS:
Case-notes of consecutive women undergoing implant-based BR from May 2011 to November 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were extracted using a standardised pro-forma and the rate of early complications, major complications and implant loss compared between procedure groups.
RESULTS:
Forty-six implant-based reconstructions were performed for malignancy (n = 31, 67.4%) or prophylaxis (n = 15, 32.6%) in 31 women over the 18-month study period. ADM (Tecnoss Protexa(®), Tecnoss S.r.l.) was used in 31 (67.4%) cases. There were no differences in patient age, BMI, co-morbidities, smoking or chemotherapy between groups, but patients receiving ADM were more likely to have received radiotherapy prior to their reconstruction (n = 6, 30% vs. n = 0, 0%, p = 0.043). The overall rate of early complications was 26.1% (n = 12) but there was no significant difference between procedure groups (standard-n = 4, 27.7% vs. ADM-n = 8, 25.8%; p = 0.950). There were 2 (4.3%) major complications none of which were associated with ADM use (standard-n = 2, 13.3% vs. ADM-n = 0, 0.0%; p = 0.038). There were 6 (13.0%) implant losses of which 4 were in the ADM group (standard-n = 2, 13.3% vs. ADM-n = 4, 12.9%; p = 0.968). All of these were associated with pre-reconstruction radiotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS:
ADM-assisted implant-based reconstruction with Tecnoss Protexa(®) is safe and may improve outcomes for women by facilitating a single-stage procedure. Robust prospective evaluation is now needed to definitively evaluate the role of ADM in implant-based BR.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113-9
JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Structured keywords

  • Centre for Surgical Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this