Anxieties over the potential impacts of climate change, often framed in apocalyptic language, are having a profound but little-studied effect on the contemporary western urbanscape. This paper examines the ways in which current theorisations of 'Ecological Gentrification' express only half the process, describing how green space is used for social control, but not how ecology is used as a justification regime for such projects. As urbanites seek out housing and living practices which have a lower environmental impact, urban planners have responded by providing large-scale regeneration of the urbanscape. With the demand for this housing increasing, questions of inequality, displacement and dispossession arise. I ask whether apocalyptic anxiety is being enrolled in the justification regimes of these projects to make them hard-to-resist at the planning and implementation stages. The paper shows that in capitalizing on collective anxiety surrounding an apocalyptic future, these projects depoliticize Subjects by using the empty signifier of ‘Sustainability’ leading them into an immuno-political relationship to the urbanscape. This leaves Subjects feeling protected from both responsibility for and the impacts of climate change. Ultimately this has the consequence of gentrification coupled with potentially worsening consumptive practices, rebound effects and the depoliticization of the environmentally conscious urbanite.
|Number of pages||17|
|Journal||International Journal of Urban and Regional Research|
|Early online date||28 Oct 2019|
|Publication status||E-pub ahead of print - 28 Oct 2019|
- Ecological Gentrification
- Climate Change