TY - JOUR
T1 - Ecological Modernisation and the Governance of Carbon
T2 - A Critical Analysis
AU - Bailey, Ian
AU - Gouldson, Andy
AU - Newell, Peter
PY - 2011/6/1
Y1 - 2011/6/1
N2 - In this paper, we use insights derived from a critical evaluation of ecological modernisation theories to examine the origins and influence of new, market-based, forms of carbon governance. Focusing on two key examples-emissions trading in Europe and the global market in offsets-we argue that ecological modernisation theories can help us understand the processes through which the seemingly intractable problem of climate change has been reframed as an opportunity to construct a new carbon economy and anticipate some of the tensions, contradictions and limits of such an approach. We then explore the governance dimensions of these novel market mechanisms, look athow they work, and then discusswhether,to what extentandfor whomthey work. We highlight a series of (un)-intended consequences that flow from these practices and modes of governing. We conclude by discussing the significance of these observations both for debates on climate change and the governance of carbon and for theories of ecological modernisation.
AB - In this paper, we use insights derived from a critical evaluation of ecological modernisation theories to examine the origins and influence of new, market-based, forms of carbon governance. Focusing on two key examples-emissions trading in Europe and the global market in offsets-we argue that ecological modernisation theories can help us understand the processes through which the seemingly intractable problem of climate change has been reframed as an opportunity to construct a new carbon economy and anticipate some of the tensions, contradictions and limits of such an approach. We then explore the governance dimensions of these novel market mechanisms, look athow they work, and then discusswhether,to what extentandfor whomthey work. We highlight a series of (un)-intended consequences that flow from these practices and modes of governing. We conclude by discussing the significance of these observations both for debates on climate change and the governance of carbon and for theories of ecological modernisation.
KW - Accountability and outcome deficits
KW - Carbon markets
KW - Climate governance
KW - Ecological modernisation
KW - Legitimacy
KW - Political drivers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955725084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00880.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00880.x
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
AN - SCOPUS:79955725084
SN - 0066-4812
VL - 43
SP - 682
EP - 703
JO - Antipode
JF - Antipode
IS - 3
ER -