Educating the design stance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bullot & Reber (B&R) put forth a design stance to fuse psychological and art historical accounts of visual thinking into a single theory. We argue that this aspect of their proposal needs further fine-tuning. Issues of transgression and coherence are necessary to provide stability to the design stance. We advocate looking to Art Education for such fundamentals of picture understanding.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-142
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Bibliographical note

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (2), pp 141-142 2013, © 2013 Cambridge University Press.

Structured keywords

  • Developmental

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Educating the design stance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this