Abstract
Bullot & Reber (B&R) put forth a design stance to fuse psychological and art historical accounts of visual thinking into a single theory. We argue that this aspect of their proposal needs further fine-tuning. Issues of transgression and coherence are necessary to provide stability to the design stance. We advocate looking to Art Education for such fundamentals of picture understanding.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 141-142 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2013 |
Bibliographical note
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (2), pp 141-142 2013, © 2013 Cambridge University Press.Research Groups and Themes
- Developmental (Psychological Science)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Educating the design stance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver