Abstract
This study examines how the winsorization procedure affects the performance of regression-based earnings forecasting models. I find that the impact is multifaceted and depends principally on three factors: the level of data errors in the tails, the characteristics of firms affected by the process, and the use of scaling. For a non-GAAP earnings yield specification, where data input errors exist, winsorization changes the information set in a non-systematic way and helps to improve the performance of regression-based forecasts, especially when the least squares estimator is employed. However, for a non-GAAP earnings per share specification, with fewer data input errors found in the tails of the distribution, winsorization has a particularly strong effect on very large companies, lowering the economic value of earnings predictions. I observe similar results for corresponding GAAP earnings specifications. Robust estimators, such as least absolute deviation, high breakdown-point and Theil-Sen, appear to be a more effective solution than winsorization. Their earnings forecasts consistently yield significant positive abnormal returns across non-GAAP and GAAP earnings specifications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 105-135 |
Number of pages | 31 |
Journal | Journal of Business Finance and Accounting |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
Early online date | 15 Jan 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 14 Feb 2019 |
Keywords
- earnings forecasts
- influential observations
- robust regression
- scaling
- stock returns
- winsorization
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of winsorization: The cases of forecasting non-GAAP and GAAP earnings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Dr Ruby Brownen-Trinh
- School of Accounting and Finance - Business School - Senior Lecturer in Accounting
Person: Academic