Abstract
Geographical and interdisciplinary literatures often focus on the enduring losses engendered by industrial closure and economic change, describing the moment of deindustrialisation as a cut in the fabric of history. In this imaginary, people and place become suspended in the past, through ‘melancholy’ logics of attachment, ruination and loss. The aim of this article is to reorient these melancholy temporalities by demonstrating memory's central, though perhaps paradoxical, role in transitioning bodies through the afterlife of economic closure. Alongside three stories from an empirical study of life after two coal mine closures in Australia and China, I look to theories of melancholy and habit—understood as embodied, preconscious forms of non-representational memory—to explore workers' capacities to reorient and rebuild subjectivity in the wake of closure's interruptions and disorientations. I emphasise the work of memory in knitting together life after ‘the end’, through transitional processes of reckoning, acting and learning that engender changing bodily intensities and evaluations, and the possibility of a renewed sense of life as ordinary. Taken together, this article makes paired contributions to literatures on economic change and geographies of memory. By looking beyond linear narratives of rupture and decline, it recognises the afterlife of industrial closure as an intimate site of transition without losing sight of the past. By showing how even melancholy memories are imbricated in the production of altered presents and futures, it emphasises memory's parallax operation as an embodied force of differentiation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers |
| Early online date | 29 Jan 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 29 Jan 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Acknowledgements:I am grateful to David Bissell, Thomas Dekeyser, Chris Philo and Anna Secor for reading and commenting on this manuscript at different stages. I thank editor Katherine Brickell and three anonymous reviewers for their careful engagement, and audiences at the 2021 RGS‐IBG and 2023 AAG conferences, and the Social and Cultural Geographies group at the National University of Singapore for lively questions and feedback. The project from which this article is drawn was undertaken at the University of Melbourne, and supported by an Australian Government Research Training Place Scholarship, Endeavour Research Fellowship, and Elizabeth and Vernon Puzey Scholarship.
Publisher Copyright:
The information, practices and views in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG). © 2024 The Authors. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Geographical Society (with The Institute of British Geographers).
Keywords
- affective transition
- industrial closure
- interview vignettes
- labour branching
- non-representational memory
- subjective transformation