Abstract
Background: Over half of all deaths in Europe occur in hospital: a location associated with many complaints. Initiatives to improve inpatient end of life care (EoLC) are therefore a priority. In England over 78,000 volunteers provide a potentially cost-effective resource to hospitals. Many work with people who are dying and their families, yet little is known about their training in EoLC.
Aims: To explore hospital volunteers’ EoLC training needs and learning preferences, and the acceptability of training evaluation methods.
Design: Qualitative focus groups.
Setting/Participants: Volunteers from a large teaching hospital were purposively sampled.
Results: Five focus groups were conducted with 25 hospital volunteers (aged 19-80 years). Four themes emerged: preparation for the volunteering role, training needs, training preferences, and evaluation preferences. Many described encounters with patients with life-threatening illness, and their families. Perceived training needs in EoLC included communication skills, grief and bereavement, spiritual diversity, common symptoms, and self-care. Volunteers valued learning from peers and EoLC specialists, using interactive teaching methods including real case examples and role plays. A chance to ‘refresh’ training at a later date was suggested to enhance learning. Evaluation through self-reports or observations were acceptable, but ratings by patients, families, and staff were thought to be pragmatically unsuitable owing to sporadic contact with each.
Conclusion: Gaps in EoLC training for hospital volunteers indicate scope to maximise on this resource. This evidence will inform development of training and evaluations which could better enable volunteers to make positive, cost-effective contributions to EoLC in hospitals.
Aims: To explore hospital volunteers’ EoLC training needs and learning preferences, and the acceptability of training evaluation methods.
Design: Qualitative focus groups.
Setting/Participants: Volunteers from a large teaching hospital were purposively sampled.
Results: Five focus groups were conducted with 25 hospital volunteers (aged 19-80 years). Four themes emerged: preparation for the volunteering role, training needs, training preferences, and evaluation preferences. Many described encounters with patients with life-threatening illness, and their families. Perceived training needs in EoLC included communication skills, grief and bereavement, spiritual diversity, common symptoms, and self-care. Volunteers valued learning from peers and EoLC specialists, using interactive teaching methods including real case examples and role plays. A chance to ‘refresh’ training at a later date was suggested to enhance learning. Evaluation through self-reports or observations were acceptable, but ratings by patients, families, and staff were thought to be pragmatically unsuitable owing to sporadic contact with each.
Conclusion: Gaps in EoLC training for hospital volunteers indicate scope to maximise on this resource. This evidence will inform development of training and evaluations which could better enable volunteers to make positive, cost-effective contributions to EoLC in hospitals.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 842-852 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Palliative Medicine |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 6 Jan 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2017 |
Keywords
- education
- hospital volunteers
- palliative care
- qualitative research
- terminal care
- Volunteers