Engaging domestic abuse practitioners and survivors in a review of outcome tools: – reflections on differing priorities

Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir Clark, Melissa Kimber, Lucy Downes, Gene S Feder, Elaine Fulton, Emma Howarth, Karen Johns, Ursula Lindenberg, Ana Flavia D'Oliveira, Amira Shaheen, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Claire Powell*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

71 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Researchers often develop and decide upon the measurement tools for assessing outcomes related to domestic abuse interventions. However, it is known that clients, service providers and researchers have different ideas about the outcomes that should be measured as markers of success. Evidence from non-domestic abuse sectors indicates that engagement of service providers, clients and researchers contributes to more robust research, policy and practice. We reflect on what we have learnt from the engagement of practitioners and domestic abuse survivors in a review of domestic abuse measurement tools where there were clear differences in priorities between survivors, practitioners and researchers about the ideal measurement tools. The purpose of this reflective article is to support the improvement of future outcome measurement from domestic abuse interventions, while ensuring that domestic abuse survivors do not relive trauma because of measurement.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalResearch for All
Volume7
Issue number1
Early online date23 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 May 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Engaging domestic abuse practitioners and survivors in a review of outcome tools: – reflections on differing priorities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this