TY - JOUR
T1 - Equity and need when waiting for total hip replacement surgery
AU - Fitzpatrick, Ray
AU - Norquist, Josephine M.
AU - Reeves, Barnaby C.
AU - Morris, Richard W.
AU - Murray, David W.
AU - Gregg, Paul J.
PY - 2004/2/1
Y1 - 2004/2/1
N2 - Objectives: To explore sociodemographic and health status factors associated with waiting times both for first outpatient appointment and for total hip replacement surgery (THR). Methods: A survey of THR in five former English regions was conducted between September 1996 and October 1997. Every patient listed for THR was asked to fill out a questionnaire preoperatively. This questionnaire included the 12-item Oxford Hip Score (OHS) questionnaire and two questions on the length of time patients waited for an outpatient appointment and subsequently for their operation. Results: From multiple logistic regression analyses, region, private vs. public sector, housing tenure and preoperative OHS were all independently associated with a waiting time for an outpatient appointment for >3 months. Region, housing tenure and gender were also independently associated with a wait of ≥6 months on the surgical waiting list. Conclusions: A large proportion of patients had long waiting times both for an outpatient appointment and while on a surgical waiting list. There were significant differences in waiting time according to social, geographical and health care system factors. Patients with a worse pain and disability at surgery waited longer for an out-patient appointment. The longer patient waited, the worse was their pain and disability, suggesting that patients were not prioritized by these criteria. Benefits of prioritizing should be tested.
AB - Objectives: To explore sociodemographic and health status factors associated with waiting times both for first outpatient appointment and for total hip replacement surgery (THR). Methods: A survey of THR in five former English regions was conducted between September 1996 and October 1997. Every patient listed for THR was asked to fill out a questionnaire preoperatively. This questionnaire included the 12-item Oxford Hip Score (OHS) questionnaire and two questions on the length of time patients waited for an outpatient appointment and subsequently for their operation. Results: From multiple logistic regression analyses, region, private vs. public sector, housing tenure and preoperative OHS were all independently associated with a waiting time for an outpatient appointment for >3 months. Region, housing tenure and gender were also independently associated with a wait of ≥6 months on the surgical waiting list. Conclusions: A large proportion of patients had long waiting times both for an outpatient appointment and while on a surgical waiting list. There were significant differences in waiting time according to social, geographical and health care system factors. Patients with a worse pain and disability at surgery waited longer for an out-patient appointment. The longer patient waited, the worse was their pain and disability, suggesting that patients were not prioritized by these criteria. Benefits of prioritizing should be tested.
KW - Hip replacement surgery
KW - Outcomes
KW - Waiting time
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1242307982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00448.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00448.x
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 14731146
AN - SCOPUS:1242307982
SN - 1356-1294
VL - 10
SP - 3
EP - 9
JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
IS - 1
ER -