Skip to content

Establishing a Research Agenda on Mobile Health Technologies and Later-Life Pain Using an Evidence-Based Consensus Workshop Approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Pain
Early online date30 Jun 2018
DateAccepted/In press - 7 Jun 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 30 Jun 2018

Abstract

The rapid growth of mobile health (mHealth) devices holds substantial potential for improving care and care outcomes in all patient populations, including older adults with pain. However, existing research reflects a substantial gap in knowledge about how to design, evaluate, and disseminate devices to optimally address the many challenges associated with managing pain in older persons. Given these knowledge gaps, we sought to develop a set of practice-based research priorities to facilitate innovation in this field. We employed the Cornell Research-Practice Consensus Workshop Model, an evidence-based approach to generating research priorities. Sixty participants attended the conference, where stakeholder groups included older adults with pain and their caregivers, behavioral and social scientists, healthcare providers, pain experts, and specialists in mHealth and health policy. Participants generated 13 recommendations classified into 2 categories: 1) implications for designing research on mHealth among older adults (eg, conduct research on ways to enhance accessibility of mHealth tools among diverse groups of older adults with pain, expand research on mHealth sensing applications), and 2) implementation of mHealth technology into practice and associated regulatory issues (eg, promote research on ways to initiate/sustain patient behavior change, expand research on mHealth cybersecurity and privacy issues).

    Research areas

  • Pain, Aging, Mobile Health, Research Recommendations

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Elsevier at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590018303213?via%3Dihub . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 198 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

  • Supplementary information PDF

    Accepted author manuscript, 123 KB, PDF document

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups