Establishing non-inferiority in treatment trials in psychiatry - guidelines from an Expert Consensus Meeting

David J Nutt*, C. Allgulander, Y. Lecrubier, Tim Peters, U. Wittchen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comparing the efficacy of different treatments in psychiatry is difficult for many reasons, even when they are investigated in 'head-to-head' studies. A consensus meeting was, therefore, held to produce best practice guidelines for such studies. This article presents the conclusions of this consensus and illustrates it using published data in the field of antidepressant treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409-416
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Psychopharmacology
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

Keywords

  • Clinical trials
  • Duloxetine
  • GAD
  • Non-inferiority
  • Venlafaxine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Establishing non-inferiority in treatment trials in psychiatry - guidelines from an Expert Consensus Meeting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this