Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating causal associations of chronotype with pregnancy and perinatal outcomes and its interactions with insomnia and sleep duration: a mendelian randomization study

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

Abstract

Background
Observational studies suggested chronotype was associated with pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. Whether these associations are causal is unclear. Our aims are to use Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore (1) associations of evening preference with stillbirth, miscarriage, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, perinatal depression, preterm birth and offspring birthweight; and (2) differences in associations of insomnia and sleep duration with those outcomes between chronotype preferences.

Methods
We conducted two-sample MR using 105 genetic variants reported in a genome-wide association study (N = 248,100) to instrument for lifelong predisposition to evening- versus morning-preference. We generated variant-outcome associations in European ancestry women from UK Biobank (UKB, N = 176,897), Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC, N = 6826), Born in Bradford (BiB, N = 2940) and the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa, N = 57,430), and extracted equivalent associations from FinnGen (N = 190,879). We used inverse variance weighted (IVW) as main analysis, with weighted median and MR-Egger as sensitivity analyses. Relying on the individual participant data from UKB, ALSPAC, BiB and MoBa, we also conducted IVW analyses of insomnia and sleep duration on the pregnancy and perinatal outcomes, stratified by genetically predicted chronotypes.

Results
In IVW and sensitivity analyses, we did not find robust evidence of associations of chronotype with the outcomes. Insomnia was associated with a higher risk of preterm birth among evening preference women (odds ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.17, 2.21), but not among morning preference women (odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.64, 1.18), with an interaction P-value = 0.01. There was no evidence of interactions between insomnia and chronotype on other outcomes, or between sleep duration and chronotype on any outcomes.

Conclusions
This study raises the possibility of a higher risk of preterm birth among women with insomnia who also have an evening preference. Our findings warrant replications due to imprecise estimates.
Original languageEnglish
Article number816
Number of pages11
JournalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume24
Issue number1
Early online date18 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Dec 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Mendelian randomization
  • Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes
  • Sleep
  • Chronotype

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating causal associations of chronotype with pregnancy and perinatal outcomes and its interactions with insomnia and sleep duration: a mendelian randomization study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this