Projects per year
Abstract
Background
Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial malignancy in adults, contributing significantly to cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Early detection is critical for optimizing treatment and improving survival. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic potential of liquid biopsy biomarkers for detecting BM from lung, breast, and other cancers.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS databases using keywords related to liquid biopsy, biomarkers, and brain metastases. Data on participant characteristics, diagnostic reference standards, types of biomarkers, primary cancer origins, and diagnostic outcomes were independently extracted. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Results
Thirty-one studies involving 5,676 participants were included, assessing biomarkers such as cfDNA, miRNAs, proteins (e.g., NfL, GFAP, S100B), metabolomic profiles, and multi-marker models. NfL and GFAP emerged as the most promising biomarkers, demonstrating moderate to strong diagnostic performance across multiple cancer types. Multi-marker models combining NfL and GFAP achieved sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90%. S100B showed variable performance due to differences in study designs and thresholds. Emerging biomarkers like cfDNA and metabolomic profiles showed potential but require further validation.
Conclusions
Liquid biopsy biomarkers, particularly NfL and GFAP, hold promise for non-invasive BM detection. Clinical utility may be in the initial cancer workup for localised tumour to prompt brain imaging. Future research is required to validate biomarkers in larger, diverse populations across different cancer types.
Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial malignancy in adults, contributing significantly to cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Early detection is critical for optimizing treatment and improving survival. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic potential of liquid biopsy biomarkers for detecting BM from lung, breast, and other cancers.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS databases using keywords related to liquid biopsy, biomarkers, and brain metastases. Data on participant characteristics, diagnostic reference standards, types of biomarkers, primary cancer origins, and diagnostic outcomes were independently extracted. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Results
Thirty-one studies involving 5,676 participants were included, assessing biomarkers such as cfDNA, miRNAs, proteins (e.g., NfL, GFAP, S100B), metabolomic profiles, and multi-marker models. NfL and GFAP emerged as the most promising biomarkers, demonstrating moderate to strong diagnostic performance across multiple cancer types. Multi-marker models combining NfL and GFAP achieved sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90%. S100B showed variable performance due to differences in study designs and thresholds. Emerging biomarkers like cfDNA and metabolomic profiles showed potential but require further validation.
Conclusions
Liquid biopsy biomarkers, particularly NfL and GFAP, hold promise for non-invasive BM detection. Clinical utility may be in the initial cancer workup for localised tumour to prompt brain imaging. Future research is required to validate biomarkers in larger, diverse populations across different cancer types.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | npaf032 |
Journal | Neuro-Oncology Practice |
Early online date | 18 Mar 2025 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 18 Mar 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating liquid biopsy biomarkers for early detection of brain metastasis: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
8074 (C18281/A29019) ICEP2 - Programme Award: Towards improved casual evidence and enhanced prediction of cancer risk and survival
Martin, R. M. (Principal Investigator)
1/10/20 → 30/09/25
Project: Research