Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating the cardiovascular safety of sclerostin inhibition using evidence from meta-analysis of clinical trials and human genetics

  • jonas bovijn*
  • , kristi krebs
  • , Chia-Yen chen
  • , Ruth Boxall
  • , Jenny C. Censin
  • , Teresa Ferreira
  • , sarah pulit
  • , Craig A. Glastonbury
  • , Samantha Laber
  • , Iona Y Millwood
  • , Kuang Lin
  • , Liming Li
  • , Zhengming Chen
  • , Lili Milani
  • , George Davey Smith
  • , Robin G. Walters
  • , Benjamin M Neale
  • , Reedik Mägi
  • , Cecilia M Lindgren*
  • , Michael V Holmes*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

96 Citations (Scopus)
329 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Inhibition of sclerostin is a therapeutic approach to lowering fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. However, data from phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of romosozumab, a first-in-class monoclonal antibody that inhibits sclerostin, suggest an imbalance of serious cardiovascular events, and regulatory agencies have issued marketing authorizations with warnings of cardiovascular disease. Here we meta-analyze published and unpublished cardiovascular outcome trial data of romosozumab and investigate whether genetic variants that mimic therapeutic inhibition of sclerostin are associated with higher risk of cardiovascular disease. Meta-analysis of up to three RCTs indicated a probable higher risk of cardiovascular events with romosozumab. Scaled to the equivalent dose of romosozumab [210 mg/month; 0.09 g/cm2 higher bone mineral density (BMD)], the SOST genetic variants were associated with lower risk of fracture and osteoporosis (commensurate with the therapeutic effect of romosozumab), and with a higher risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and/or coronary revascularization and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The same variants were also associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) and central adiposity. Taken together, our findings indicate that inhibition of sclerostin may elevate cardiovascular risk, warranting a rigorous evaluation of the cardiovascular safety of romosozumab and other sclerostin inhibitors.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbereaay6570
Number of pages22
JournalScience Translational Medicine
Volume12
Issue number549
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jun 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the cardiovascular safety of sclerostin inhibition using evidence from meta-analysis of clinical trials and human genetics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this