Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

JS Barkun; JK Aronson; LS Feldman; GJ Maddern; SM Strasberg; Collaboration Balliol; DG Altman; JS Barkun; JM Blazeby; IC Boutron; WB Campbell; PA Clavien; JA Cook; PL Ergina; DR Flum; P Glasziou; JC Marshall; P McCulloch; J Nicholl; BC Reeves; CM Seiler; JL Meakins; D Ashby; N Black; J Bunker; M Burton; M Campbell; K Chalkidou; I Chalmers; M de Leval; J Deeks; A Grant; M Gray; R Greenhalgh; M Jenicek; S Kehoe; R Lilford; P Littlejohns; Y Loke; R Madhock; K McPherson; P Rothwell; B Summerskill; D Taggard; P Tekkis; M Thompson; T Treasure; U Trohler; J Vandenbroucke

doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

JS Barkun, JK Aronson, LS Feldman, GJ Maddern, SM Strasberg, Collaboration Balliol, DG Altman, JS Barkun, JM Blazeby, IC Boutron, WB Campbell, PA Clavien, JA Cook, PL Ergina, DR Flum, P Glasziou, JC Marshall, P McCulloch, J Nicholl, BC ReevesCM Seiler, JL Meakins, D Ashby, N Black, J Bunker, M Burton, M Campbell, K Chalkidou, I Chalmers, M de Leval, J Deeks, A Grant, M Gray, R Greenhalgh, M Jenicek, S Kehoe, R Lilford, P Littlejohns, Y Loke, R Madhock, K McPherson, P Rothwell, B Summerskill, D Taggard, P Tekkis, M Thompson, T Treasure, U Trohler, J Vandenbroucke

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

471 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.

Translated title of the contribution	Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations
Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1089 - 1096
Number of pages	8
Journal	Lancet
Volume	374(9695):
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7
Publication status	Published - Sept 2009

Bibliographical note

Other: Pub Med ID 19782874

Research Groups and Themes

BTC (Bristol Trials Centre)

Access to Document

10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19782874

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

Barkun, JS., Aronson, JK., Feldman, LS., Maddern, GJ., Strasberg, SM., Balliol, C., Altman, DG., Barkun, JS., Blazeby, JM., Boutron, IC., Campbell, WB., Clavien, PA., Cook, JA., Ergina, PL., Flum, DR., Glasziou, P., Marshall, JC., McCulloch, P., Nicholl, J., ... Vandenbroucke, J. (2009). Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet, 374(9695):, 1089 - 1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

@article{fb892e280cf545d088309d6998a4ea30,

title = "Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations",

abstract = "Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.",

author = "JS Barkun and JK Aronson and LS Feldman and GJ Maddern and SM Strasberg and Collaboration Balliol and DG Altman and JS Barkun and JM Blazeby and IC Boutron and WB Campbell and PA Clavien and JA Cook and PL Ergina and DR Flum and P Glasziou and JC Marshall and P McCulloch and J Nicholl and BC Reeves and CM Seiler and JL Meakins and D Ashby and N Black and J Bunker and M Burton and M Campbell and K Chalkidou and I Chalmers and {de Leval}, M and J Deeks and A Grant and M Gray and R Greenhalgh and M Jenicek and S Kehoe and R Lilford and P Littlejohns and Y Loke and R Madhock and K McPherson and P Rothwell and B Summerskill and D Taggard and P Tekkis and M Thompson and T Treasure and U Trohler and J Vandenbroucke",

note = "Other: Pub Med ID 19782874",

year = "2009",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7",

language = "English",

volume = "374(9695):",

pages = "1089 -- 1096",

journal = "Lancet",

issn = "1474-547X",

publisher = "Lancet Publishing Group",

}

Barkun, JS, Aronson, JK, Feldman, LS, Maddern, GJ, Strasberg, SM, Balliol, C, Altman, DG, Barkun, JS, Blazeby, JM, Boutron, IC, Campbell, WB, Clavien, PA, Cook, JA, Ergina, PL, Flum, DR, Glasziou, P, Marshall, JC, McCulloch, P, Nicholl, J, Reeves, BC, Seiler, CM, Meakins, JL, Ashby, D, Black, N, Bunker, J, Burton, M, Campbell, M, Chalkidou, K, Chalmers, I, de Leval, M, Deeks, J, Grant, A, Gray, M, Greenhalgh, R, Jenicek, M, Kehoe, S, Lilford, R, Littlejohns, P, Loke, Y, Madhock, R, McPherson, K, Rothwell, P, Summerskill, B, Taggard, D, Tekkis, P, Thompson, M, Treasure, T, Trohler, U & Vandenbroucke, J 2009, 'Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations', Lancet, vol. 374(9695):, pp. 1089 - 1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

AU - Barkun, JS

AU - Aronson, JK

AU - Feldman, LS

AU - Maddern, GJ

AU - Strasberg, SM

AU - Balliol, Collaboration

AU - Altman, DG

AU - Barkun, JS

AU - Blazeby, JM

AU - Boutron, IC

AU - Campbell, WB

AU - Clavien, PA

AU - Cook, JA

AU - Ergina, PL

AU - Flum, DR

AU - Glasziou, P

AU - Marshall, JC

AU - McCulloch, P

AU - Nicholl, J

AU - Reeves, BC

AU - Seiler, CM

AU - Meakins, JL

AU - Ashby, D

AU - Black, N

AU - Bunker, J

AU - Burton, M

AU - Campbell, M

AU - Chalkidou, K

AU - Chalmers, I

AU - de Leval, M

AU - Deeks, J

AU - Grant, A

AU - Gray, M

AU - Greenhalgh, R

AU - Jenicek, M

AU - Kehoe, S

AU - Lilford, R

AU - Littlejohns, P

AU - Loke, Y

AU - Madhock, R

AU - McPherson, K

AU - Rothwell, P

AU - Summerskill, B

AU - Taggard, D

AU - Tekkis, P

AU - Thompson, M

AU - Treasure, T

AU - Trohler, U

AU - Vandenbroucke, J

N1 - Other: Pub Med ID 19782874

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.

AB - Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

SN - 1474-547X

VL - 374(9695):

SP - 1089

EP - 1096

JO - Lancet

JF - Lancet

ER -

Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Research Groups and Themes

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this