Evaluation Methods for Non-Experimental Data

Richard Blundell; Monica Costa Dias

doi:10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00031.x

Evaluation Methods for Non-Experimental Data

Richard Blundell, Monica Costa Dias

School of Economics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

516 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a review of non-experimental methods for the evaluation of social programmes. We consider matching and selection methods and analyse each for cross-section, repeated cross-section and longitudinal data. The methods are assessed drawing on evidence from labour market programmes in the UK and in the US.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	427-468
Number of pages	42
Journal	Fiscal Studies
Volume	21
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00031.x
Publication status	Published - Dec 2000

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00031.x

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{4cf2f180d8bc4ac9bbe48584c8fa23d7,

title = "Evaluation Methods for Non-Experimental Data",

abstract = "This paper presents a review of non-experimental methods for the evaluation of social programmes. We consider matching and selection methods and analyse each for cross-section, repeated cross-section and longitudinal data. The methods are assessed drawing on evidence from labour market programmes in the UK and in the US.",

author = "Richard Blundell and {Costa Dias}, Monica",

year = "2000",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00031.x",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "427--468",

journal = "Fiscal Studies",

issn = "0143-5671",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation Methods for Non-Experimental Data

AU - Blundell, Richard

AU - Costa Dias, Monica

PY - 2000/12

Y1 - 2000/12

N2 - This paper presents a review of non-experimental methods for the evaluation of social programmes. We consider matching and selection methods and analyse each for cross-section, repeated cross-section and longitudinal data. The methods are assessed drawing on evidence from labour market programmes in the UK and in the US.

AB - This paper presents a review of non-experimental methods for the evaluation of social programmes. We consider matching and selection methods and analyse each for cross-section, repeated cross-section and longitudinal data. The methods are assessed drawing on evidence from labour market programmes in the UK and in the US.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0003135994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00031.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2000.tb00031.x

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

AN - SCOPUS:0003135994

SN - 0143-5671

VL - 21

SP - 427

EP - 468

JO - Fiscal Studies

JF - Fiscal Studies

IS - 4

ER -

Evaluation Methods for Non-Experimental Data

Abstract

Access to Document

Handle.net

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this