Methods Mixed-methods controlled before-and-after study with nested case studies. 31 acute hospitals in England and Wales which introduced COPD care bundles (implementation sites) or provided usual care (comparator sites) were recruited and provided monthly aggregate data. 14 sites provided additional individual patient data. Participants were adults admitted with an acute exacerbation of COPD.
Results There was no evidence that care bundles reduced 28-day COPD re-admission rates: OR=1·02 (95% CI:0·83, 1·26). However, the rate of ED attendance was reduced in implementation sites over and above that in comparator sites (implementation: IRR=0·63 (95% CI:0·56,0·71); comparator: IRR=1·12 (95% CI:1·02,1·24); group-time interaction p<0·001). At implementation sites, delivery of all bundle elements was higher but was only achieved in 2.2% (admissions bundle) and 7.6% (discharge bundle) of cases. There was no evidence of cost effectiveness. Staff viewed bundles positively, believing they help standardise practice and facilitate communication between clinicians. However, they lacked skills in change management leading to inconsistent implementation.
Discussion COPD care bundles were not effectively implemented in this study. They were associated with a reduced number of subsequent ED attendances, but not with change in re-admissions, mortality or reduced costs. This is unsurprising given the low level of bundle uptake in implementation sites and it remains to be determined if COPD care bundles affect patient care and outcomes when they are effectively implemented.
- BTC (Bristol Trials Centre)
- Centre for Surgical Research