Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions

Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Haris S Vasiliadis, Julian P T Higgins, Georgia Salanti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

335 Citations (Scopus)


The assumption of consistency, defined as agreement between direct and indirect sources of evidence, underlies the increasingly popular method of network meta-analysis. No evidence exists so far regarding the extent of inconsistency in full networks of interventions or the factors that control its statistical detection.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)332-45
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Epidemiology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this